Friday, July 25, 2014

LM sales force in pre-Internet era

Some of LM's sales force must still be in the pre-Internet era and think they can fib to U.S. allies in just about any forum. Certainly no one in the U.S. watches Fuji TV.

Here is an interesting article that may point to the fact that one of LM's international salespeople for the F-35 is making up just about any story they want.

Now. Notice the lead photo for the article is an F-22 and that the way the article is written, there may be something lost in the translation, but look at these quotes; including the "fifth-generation" meme:

Dave Scott, Lockheed Martin's director of international customer engagement for F-35s, dismissed claims that the Russian T-50 and Chinese J-20 qualify as fifth-generation fighters during an interview with Fuji Television Network. The US F-35 is the only fifth generation fighter aircraft that deserves Japanese investment, he said.

Addressing Japan's greatest concern, Russia's T-50 and China's J-20, Scott referred to a report by AFRL ( Air Force Research Laboratory .ep) that claimed the F-35 is able to outperform its heavyweight opponents effortlessly by reducing 30-70% of the fuel load and increasing the supersonic cruising radius by 50%. He also referred to a statement of Boeing, manufacturer of the F/A-18E Hornet, claiming that the T-50 and J-20 as not completely fifth generation.

Any nonsense will do when the U.S. talks to its "allies". The fuel load idea is outrageous. Is that before or after emerging PacRim threats take out our tankers?

National security is not important.

Sales figures are.


---

-Time's Battleland - 5 Part series on F-35 procurement - 2013 
-Summary of Air Power Australia F-35 points
-Bill Sweetman, Aviation Week and the F-35
-U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) F-35 reports
-F-35 JSF: Cold War Anachronism Without a Mission
-History of F-35 Production Cuts
-Looking at the three Japan contenders (maneuverability)
-How the Canadian DND misleads the public about the F-35
-Value of STOVL F-35B over-hyped
-Cuckoo in the nest--U.S. DOD DOT&E F-35 report is out
-6 Feb 2012 Letter from SASC to DOD boss Panetta questioning the decision to lift probation on the F-35B STOVL.
-USAFs F-35 procurement plan is not believable
-December 2011 Australia/Canada Brief
-F-35 Key Performance Perimeters (KPP) and Feb 2012 CRS report
-F-35 DOD Select Acquisition Report (SAR) FY2012
-Release of F-35 2012 test report card shows continued waste on a dud program
-Australian Defence answers serious F-35 project concerns with "so what?"
-Land of the Lost (production cut history update March 2013)
-Outgoing LM F-35 program boss admits to flawed weight assumptions (March 2013)
-A look at the F-35 program's astro-turfing
-F-35 and F-16 cost per flying hour
-Is this aircraft worth over $51B of USMC tac-air funding?
-Combat radius and altitude, A model
-F-35A, noise abatement and airfields and the USAF
-Deceptive marketing practice: F-35 blocks
-The concurrency fraud
-The dung beetle's "it's known" lie
-F-35's air-to-air ability limited
-F-35 Blocks--2006 and today
-The F-35B design is leaking fuel
-F-35 deliveries
-ADF's wacky F-35 assumptions

No comments: